Pull requests, not tickets
Findings come back as PRs against your default branch, patched with your own helpers.
interopt works through your codebase like a senior reviewer — and refuses to report anything it can't prove against the source it opened.
interopt clones your repository into an isolated, ephemeral sandbox and opens the files a finding depends on — tracing call paths the way a senior reviewer does, not pattern-matching from the outside.
Three guards gate each finding before it is allowed to exist. Nothing is cited from memory, so what lands in your queue is evidence the agent stood behind — not a guess.
Once a finding is proven, interopt drafts a patch using the safe helpers already in your codebase and opens a pull request — you review the change, with a replayable transcript.
Each guard is cheap to run and expensive to fake. A finding that fails any one of them is dropped — not downgraded.
The agent actually opened the file it is about to cite — no claims about code it never saw.
The symbol or line referenced is present at that exact path, right now.
The vulnerable path is reachable from real input — not a theoretical edge no attacker can hit.
Findings come back as PRs against your default branch, patched with your own helpers.
Reads source, not signatures — coverage isn't tied to a rules pack.
Cloned into a throwaway environment. Nothing touches production.
Replay the exact steps behind every finding, end to end.
Run in your own VPC with SSO, SAML, and audit logs.
One command. interopt clones, reads, proves, and opens a pull request — you review the patch, not the noise.