interopt reads your codebase like a senior reviewer, proves every finding against the source it actually opened, and ships a fix — a security system that doesn't shout.
Catch the same thing twice. Miss anything that requires reading.
Fire payloads at endpoints with no app context.
Cites files it never read. Looks good until review.
Gold standard. Four weeks. PDF goes stale.
interopt clones your repository into an isolated sandbox and opens the files a finding depends on — tracing call paths like a senior reviewer instead of pattern-matching from the outside.
Three path guards — read, exists, contained — gate each finding before it is allowed to exist. Nothing is cited from memory, so what lands in your queue is evidence, not a guess.
Once a finding is proven, interopt drafts a patch using the safe helpers already in your codebase and opens a pull request — you review the change, not a backlog of maybes.
Fabricated findings. Every alert in your queue cleared all three path guards — read, exists, contained.
Of submitted findings cite a file the agent actually opened.
When a finding cites the exact line it came from, the conversation moves straight to the fix.
“It reads like a senior reviewer wrote the finding, not a scanner dump.”
“The citations changed how fast engineering trusted the output.”
“We stopped debating whether the issue was real and started fixing it.”
One command. interopt clones, reads, proves, and opens a pull request — you review the patch, not the noise.
You've seen how it reads, proves, and fixes. Point interopt at a repository and let the patches start landing — every one cited to the line, none of it from memory.